Abstract
The technique of bonding orthodontic brackets utilizing a transfer tray, otherwise known as indirect bonding, is a dichotomous subject. It allows for more accurate bracket placement and reduced chair time for the patient and doctor, yet its technique sensitivity can yield bracket failures at the time of tray removal. With the recent development of 3M's Sondhi Rapid Set, an adhesive specifically designed for orthodontic bonding, the purpose of this study was to compare this fairly new indirect adhesive with 3M's Transbond XT and Reliance's Rely-A-Bond.
Two hundred and seventy freshly extracted bovine teeth were mounted in acrylic resin and divided into 18 groups of 15 teeth each. Nine groups were bonded indirectly and nine groups were bonded directly. The direct bonded groups served as a control. The same method of indirect bonding was used for each indirect sample. The indirect bonding method was developed by L. White and included the use of the Surebonder glue gun for the fabrication of the transfer tray. The direct bonded and indirect bonded samples were debonded at 10 min., 24 hr., and 30 days using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. Three different data groups were arranged: a data group which listed all samples, a data group that included plus or minus 1 standard deviation from the mean, and a binomial data group. Statistical comparisons were made for each resin bonded directly vs. indirectly. Statistical comparisons were also made between the individual adhesives to see if one performed better than another. Mann-Whitney U-Test was carried out for the all data and plus/minus 1 standard deviation groups while a Two-Sample Binomial Test was used for the binomial data. Transbond XT bonded directly had statistically significant greater bond strength than Transbond XT when bonded indirectly. Rely-A-Bond and Sondhi adhesives produced no statistically significant difference when bonded directly vs. indirectly. Transbond XT when bonded directly showed statistically significant greater bond strength than Rely-A-Bond or Sondhi when those adhesives were bonded directly. Yet, when Transbond XT was bonded indirectly, no statistical significant difference resulted when comparing Sondhi adhesive bonded indirectly, or Rely-A-Bond bonded indirectly.
LLU Discipline
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Department
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
School
Graduate School
First Advisor
Craig Andreiko
Second Advisor
Jay S. Kim
Third Advisor
Leroy Leggitt
Fourth Advisor
Raymond Sugiyama
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Degree Level
M.S.
Year Degree Awarded
2002
Date (Title Page)
8-2002
Language
English
Library of Congress/MESH Subject Headings
Dental Bonding; Resins; Dental Cements
Type
Thesis
Page Count
viii; 36
Digital Format
Digital Publisher
Loma Linda University Libraries
Copyright
Author
Usage Rights
This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights.
Recommended Citation
Rondon, Aaron, "Bond Strengths of Three Orthodontic Adhesives for Direct and Indirect Bonding" (2002). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 2103.
https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/2103
Collection
Loma Linda University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Collection Website
http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/
Repository
Loma Linda University. Del E. Webb Memorial Library. University Archives
Included in
Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment Commons, Dental Materials Commons, Orthodontics and Orthodontology Commons