Abstract
Physicians are customarily the first point of contact for parents who are concerned about a child’s development. Thus, it is important for physicians to be current and educated about childhood disorders and subsequent treatment for those disorders. Recently, empirical evidence has led to the proposal of early indicators of autism supporting that autism may be diagnosed accurately in children less than three years old. Furthermore, formal screening and assessment parameters developed by medical organizations have been proposed in order to identify autism as early as possible (American Academy of Neurology, 2000). While the proposed parameters and empirical evidence support early indicators of autism, medical professionals still typically diagnose autism at 5-6 years of age. As we know from research on early intervention, intervention strategies as late as 5-6 years of age may have serious implications for a child’s future prognosis.
Currently, there is no literature that describes what factors affect when and how physicians diagnose autism. In order to initiate an evaluation of the processes, factors, and theories that may affect how physicians make their decisions to diagnose autism, 50 family physicians, 50 pediatricians, 50 pediatric neurologist and 50 child psychiatrists were randomly selected from the physician directory covering Southern California to complete a questionnaire created developed for this study. A total of total 16 physicians completed and returned the questionnaire, achieving an 8% response rate with most of the respondents being pediatric neurologists (37.5%), and pediatric psychiatrists (31.3%). Five major implications were found including; insufficient time with a patient impeding timely and accurate diagnosis of developmental disabilities and autism; the beliefs of the physician play some role in how quickly autism is suspected and/or diagnosed, training a physician receives in autism enhanced the ability to diagnose and aid in intervention, a lack of the knowledge and utilization of formal assessment measures, particularly the AAN guidelines and parameters was prevalent, and physicians who typically provide the first form of professional contact to families with developing children, spend the least amount of time with their patients, were the least aware of the AAN guidelines, and reported the least amount of education/training with autism. Based on the aforementioned findings, implications and suggestions for further research are provided.
LLU Discipline
Psychology
Department
Psychology
School
Graduate School
First Advisor
Kiti Freier
Second Advisor
Mari Baum
Third Advisor
Matt Riggs
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Degree Level
M.A.
Year Degree Awarded
2003
Date (Title Page)
6-2003
Language
English
Library of Congress/MESH Subject Headings
Autistic Disorder -- diagnosis; Early Diagnosis; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Type
Thesis
Page Count
ix; 78
Digital Format
Digital Publisher
Loma Linda University Libraries
Copyright
Author
Usage Rights
This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights.
Recommended Citation
Palafox, Gwennyth Li Sze, "Exploring the Physician’s Processes: Diagnosing Autism" (2003). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 2564.
https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/2564
Collection
Loma Linda University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Collection Website
http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/
Repository
Loma Linda University. Del E. Webb Memorial Library. University Archives