Abstract
In order to better understand the needs of an increasing dually diagnosed population, this study compares the efficacy of integrated vs. nonintegrated treatment programs for a dually diagnosed population, residing at a Long Term Care facility in San Bernardino, California. Patients in this setting are diagnosed with chronic and acute mental illness and chemical dependency. This study tested the hypotheses that the nonintegrated treatment program would result in a higher frequency of assaults, PRNs, Q15s, and Code Reds; increase the duration of Q15s; and, increase the Addiction Severity Index’s (ASI) Family/Social and Psychiatric subscales’ scores, which would indicate lower levels of functioning. Archival secondary source data was used from 36 adult patients with a mean age of 39 years old. Fifty-five percent were female. The ethnic composition was: 63% Caucasian, 18% Hispanic, 16% African- American, and 3% Asian or other minority group. The breakdowns of the DSM-IV-TR diagnoses were: Schizoaffective Disorder 55%; Schizophrenia, Paranoid 22%; Schizophrenia, Undifferentiated 11%; Bipolar Disorder 6%; Major Depression 3%; and Psychotic Disorder 3%. Sixty-eight percent of the residents had secondary psychiatric diagnoses involving chemical dependency and/or histories of substance abuse. This was a quasi-experimental study with one independent variable: treatment method. Analyses were performed with three groups: integrated, nonintegrated, and crossover. Three analyses were used to test the hypotheses that the integrated treatment program would produce better outcomes than the nonintegrated. The tests used to analyze the data were one-way ANOVA, paired sample t-test, and repeated measures ANOVA. Six dependent variables (assaults-frequency, PRNs-frequency, Q15s-frequency, Q15s-duration, and ASI Family/Social scores) were found significant, and in support of the hypotheses. For assaults and PRNs, Bonferroni post hoc tests showed significant differences of PRNs among all three groups. However, although assaults in the nonintegrated group were statistically larger than those in the crossover and the integrated treatment groups, no significant differences were found in the frequency of assaults between the integrated and crossover groups. ASI Psychiatric scores were not significantly different among the three groups since there were similar increases in scores upon discharge. The results indicate that an integrated treatment approach produces better outcomes for dually diagnosed patients.
LLU Discipline
Psychology
Department
Psychology
School
Graduate Studies
First Advisor
Louis Jenkins
Second Advisor
Nick Andonov
Third Advisor
Matt Riggs
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Degree Level
M.A.
Year Degree Awarded
2006
Date (Title Page)
6-2006
Language
English
Library of Congress/MESH Subject Headings
Substance-Related Disorders -- prevention and control; Mental Health Services -- methods; Community Mental Health Centers; Mental Disorders; Psychotic Disorders; Psychoses, Substance-Induced
Type
Thesis
Page Count
xi; 76
Digital Format
Digital Publisher
Loma Linda University Libraries
Copyright
Author
Usage Rights
This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has granted Loma Linda University a limited, non-exclusive right to make this publication available to the public. The author retains all other copyrights.
Recommended Citation
Hacker, Kelly L., "Comparing Chemical Dependency and Mental Health Programs for the Dually Diagnosed" (2006). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 2592.
https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/2592
Collection
Loma Linda University Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Collection Website
http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/
Repository
Loma Linda University. Del E. Webb Memorial Library. University Archives
Included in
Community Psychology Commons, Mental Disorders Commons, Quantitative Psychology Commons, Substance Abuse and Addiction Commons